---
title: "CHIMERA Challenge Task 2 and 3 response subtypes classification and progression prediction in bladder cancer Netherlands; First standardized multimodal benchmark with 368 patients"
sdDatePublished: "2026-09-10T04:10:00Z"
source: "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.09510"
topics:
  - name: "health care provider"
    identifier: "medtop:20000278"
  - name: "medical research"
    identifier: "medtop:20000737"
  - name: "scientific innovation"
    identifier: "medtop:20000736"
  - name: "artificial intelligence"
    identifier: "medtop:20001298"
  - name: "cancer"
    identifier: "medtop:20000447"
locations:
  - "Tokyo"
  - "Toronto"
  - "Stavanger"
  - "Fort Worth"
  - "San Diego"
  - "Tampere"
  - "Bydgoszcz"
  - "Udine"
  - "Yerevan"
  - "Hefei"
  - "Suzhou"
  - "Beiyuan"
  - "Coventry"
  - "Gelderland"
  - "North Brabant"
  - "Darmstadt"
  - "Poland"
  - "Italy"
  - "United States"
  - "Portugal"
  - "Canada"
  - "United Kingdom"
  - "Armenia"
  - "China"
  - "Germany"
  - "Japan"
  - "Finland"
  - "Netherlands"
  - "Norway"
---


CHIMERA Challenge Task 2 and 3 response subtypes classification and progression prediction in bladder cancer Netherlands; First standardized multimodal benchmark with 368 patients

CHIMERA Challenge Task 2 and 3: Response Subtypes Classification and Progression Survival Prediction in Bladder Cancer Patients using Multimodal Datasets

Graphical Abstract
CHIMERA Challenge Task 2 and 3: Response Subtypes Classification
and Progression Survival Prediction in Bladder Cancer Patients using
Multimodal Datasets
Catherine Chia, Tongjie Wang, Robert Spaans, Maryam Mohammadlou, Far-
bod Khoraminia, J. Alberto Nakauma-González, Adam Kowalewski, Parandzem
Khachatryan, Domingos Oliveira, Khrystyna Faryna, CHIMERA Challenge Con-
sortium, Marlies Wakkee, Sita Vermeulen, Tahlita Zuiverloon, Nadieh Khalili
arXiv:2609.09510v1 [eess.IV] 8 Sep 2026

Highlights
CHIMERA Challenge Task 2 and 3: Response Subtypes Classification
and Progression Survival Prediction in Bladder Cancer Patients using
Multimodal Datasets
Catherine Chia, Tongjie Wang, Robert Spaans, Maryam Mohammadlou, Far-
bod Khoraminia, J. Alberto Nakauma-González, Adam Kowalewski, Parandzem
Khachatryan, Domingos Oliveira, Khrystyna Faryna, CHIMERA Challenge Con-
sortium, Marlies Wakkee, Sita Vermeulen, Tahlita Zuiverloon, Nadieh Khalili
• First standardized multimodal benchmark for bladder cancer.
• Cohort shift and missing data limit multimodal model general-
ization.
• Cross-model errors reveal consensus-hard patients associated with
T1 substage.

CHIMERA Challenge Task 2 and 3: Response Subtypes
Classification and Progression Survival Prediction in
Bladder Cancer Patients using Multimodal Datasets
Catherine Chiaa,c,d,f,1,∗, Tongjie Wanga,b,1,∗∗, Robert Spaansa,e,f, Maryam
Mohammadloug, Farbod Khoraminiab, J. Alberto Nakauma-Gonzálezb, Adam
Kowalewskia,h,i, Parandzem Khachatryanj, Domingos Oliveirak, Khrystyna
Farynaa,f, CHIMERA Challenge Consortiumm, Marlies Wakkeec, Sita
Vermeulenl, Tahlita Zuiverloonb, Nadieh Khalilia,f
aDepartment of Pathology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University
Medical Center, the Netherlands
bDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical
Center, the Netherlands
cDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical
Center, the Netherlands
dDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, the Netherlands
eDepartment of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, the Netherlands
fOncode Institute, the Netherlands
gCenter for Cancer Eradication Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology,
Tampere University and TAYS Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
hFaculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
iDepartment of Tumor Pathology, Oncology Centre Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial
Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
jYerevan State Medical University, Armenia
kResearch and Development Unit, IMP Diagnostics, Portugal
lGenetic epidemiology, Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands
m17 Affiliations. See Section CHIMERA Challenge Consortium
Abstract
High-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) carries a substan-
tial risk of recurrence and disease progression with poor prognosis.
Current
clinical risk stratification is inadequate at predicting these prognoses. A com-
bination of clinicopathological parameters and molecular subtyping showed po-
tential to improve risk stratification. We hypothesized that integration of mul-
timodal information from clinicopathological, histopathological and molecu-
lar data has the potential to further improve patient risk stratification and
prognostic prediction. While advancement in multimodal artificial intelligence
(AI) is promising, progress remains constrained without standardized bench-
mark datasets and systematic benchmarking.
CHIMERA, a multimodal AI
challenge was organized with two tasks targeting HR-NMIBC: Task BRS
(Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Response Subtypes) predicts molecular sub-
types using histopathology and clinicopathological data, and Task Progres-
sion models time-to-progression using histopathology, clinicopathological and
RNA-sequencing data. A multimodal dataset comprising 368 patients was split

into public training and hidden validation and test sets. A total of 159 submis-
sions were made to Grand Challenge, with 13 top-performing models selected for
benchmarking. These models achieved a weighted F1 of 0.73 (Task BRS) and a
C-index of 0.68 (Task Progression).
Benchmarking revealed task-dependent
modality contribution.
Histopathology compensated for missing pathology-
derived variables in clinicopathological data in Task BRS, but Task Progres-
sion models showed dependence on such variables. Cohort-stratified test per-
formance degradation and sensitivity to missing data highlighted barriers to
transportability, motivating missingness-aware architectures and validation in
fully independent multi-institutional cohorts. CHIMERA represents the first
benchmark for evaluating multimodal AI methods in bladder cancer and estab-
lishes a foundation for future methodological advances in oncologic prediction
modeling.
Keywords:
Multimodal AI, Artificial Intelligence, Bladder Cancer, Grand
Challenge
1. Introduction
High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) is managed with
transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by adjuvant in-
travesical bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) instillations [1]. Although BCG can
induce durable disease control in a subset of patients, ˜50% of patients experience
recurrence and/or progression [2], resulting in intensified surveillance, repeated
procedures, and difficult treatment-escalation decisions. In particular, delaying
definitive treatment in patients unlikely to benefit from BCG can expose them
to unnecessary toxicity and postpone potentially curative interventions. Tra-
ditional risk stratification approaches rely on clinicopathological variables and
population-level risk groups, yet individual outcomes are heterogeneous [3].
Recent molecular profiling studies have highlighted that poor outcomes after
BCG are not random but are more common in biologically distinct molecular
subtypes[4]. De Jong et al. identified and validated three clinically relevant BCG
Response Subtypes (BRS 1–3) using transcriptomic profiling of HR-NMIBC.
BRS3 tumors were associated with inferior recurrence-free and progression-free
survival and with BCG failure [4]. Importantly, BRS stratification outperformed
guideline-recommended clinicopathological risk stratification in an independent
validation cohort, supporting the clinical relevance of these subtypes for treat-
ment selection and trial design [4]
Generating such profiles requires dedicated tissue-processing and sequencing
workflows, together with validated computational pipelines and bioinformatics
∗Corresponding author. (email: catherine.chia@radboudumc.nl)
∗∗Corresponding author. (email: t.j.wang@erasmusmc.nl)
1These authors contributed equally to this work

expertise; this process is time- and cost-intensive and requires allocation of finite
tumor tissue for RNA extraction[5]. Consequently, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq)
based transcriptomic subtyping is not yet broadly embedded in routine pathol-
ogy workflows, creating a translational gap between the potential prognostic
value of molecular subtypes and their practical availability at the point of care.
In contrast, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained histopathology is routinely
generated during diagnostic assessment and captures morphological phenotypes
associated with underlying tumor biology.
Computational pathology studies
have demonstrated that molecular phenotypes, including transcriptomic pro-
files and molecular subtypes, can be inferred from H&E whole slide images
(WSIs) [6, 7]. This motivates the first bladder-cancer task in CHIMERA: to
determine whether BCG response subtypes can be predicted from routine H&E
WSIs together with structured clinicopathological information, thereby reducing
reliance on RNA sequencing for subtype assignment.
Even when transcriptomic measurements are available, molecular subtypes
derived from bulk RNA-seq provide an incomplete representation of intratumor
heterogeneity. Bulk expression profiles aggregate signals across heterogeneous
mixtures of malignant, stromal, and immune-cell populations, potentially ob-
scuring cell-state heterogeneity [8], and do not preserve the spatial organization
of these components within the tissue [9]. Intratumor subtype heterogeneity
is therefore relevant both to discrete subtype assignment and to clinical out-
come: molecularly distinct tumor-cell states can coexist within a single blad-
der tumor, and higher representation of the high-risk class 2a state was asso-
ciated with worse progression-free survival in NMIBC [10]. Conversely, H&E
histopathology preserves spatial tissue architecture and cellular morphology but
does not directly measure gene-expression programs. RNA-seq and histopathol-
ogy may therefore provide complementary views of disease: transcriptomics
captures molecular activity, whereas histology captures spatial architecture and
phenotypic organization. Structured clinical and treatment variables provide
an additional layer of patient-level context. Prior multimodal studies integrat-
ing histopathology with molecular data, including RNA-seq-derived features,
have demonstrated the potential of such complementary information for cancer
prognosis and risk stratification [11, 12]. Integrating these modalities may con-
sequently improve individualized progression-risk estimation beyond any single
data modality alone.
Despite rapid progress in computational pathology and multimodal learning,
robust assessment of such approaches remains difficult. Methodological com-
parisons are frequently confounded by heterogeneous cohorts, endpoints, data
modalities, and evaluation protocols [13, 14]. Multimodal models additionally
face practical challenges related to cross-modal harmonization, incomplete in-
puts, cohort-specific acquisition effects, and generalization across institutions
and workflows. Moreover, algorithms developed and evaluated in isolated set-
tings may exhibit bias or limited transportability when applied to independent
populations [15, 16]. Community challenges provide an effective mechanism to
crowd-source methodological solutions under a common evaluation framework,
but clinically credible benchmarking requires prespecified evaluation procedures,
3

Training
Validation
Test
Challenge Phases
Benchmarking
Public dataset
Hidden
Hidden
Full data
access
Algorithm
performance
Leaderboards
Final model
submissions
Analyses
Participants
Top teams
Summary of
algorithms
Structured data: 
missing values
Structured data:
missing variables
Reduced models:
removing modality-
overlapping variables
Error analysis
Robustness
CHIMERA
Combining Histology, medIcal
iMaging (radiology) and
molEcular data for medical
pRognosis and diAgnosis
Figure 1: Overview of the CHIMERA Challenge phases and benchmarking workflow for blad-
der cancer multimodal modeling (Task BRS and Task Progression). Participants developed
models using the public training data and evaluated them on a hidden validation set. Final
models were then tested on the hidden test set. Top-performing solutions were included in a
six-part benchmarking analysis.
strict separation between development and final testing, and transparent base-
lines [14, 17].
To address these challenges, Combining Histology, medIcal iMaging (radi-
ology) and molEcular data for medical pRognosis and diAgnosis (CHIMERA)
was established as an international multimodal benchmarking challenge. Within
HR-NMIBC, CHIMERA comprised two complementary tasks. Task 2, hereafter
Task BRS, evaluated prediction of RNA-seq-based BCG response subtype from
H&E WSIs and structured patient and clinicopathological data. Task 3, here-
after Task Progression, evaluated patient-level time-to-progression prediction
using H&E WSIs, RNA-seq measurements, and structured data. Both tasks
used multi-institutional data, hidden validation and test s