---
title: "Italian firms B2B invoicing network Italy; few firms dominate centrality"
sdDatePublished: "2026-09-10T04:10:00Z"
source: "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.10227"
topics:
  - name: "economics"
    identifier: "medtop:20000745"
  - name: "business information"
    identifier: "medtop:20000170"
locations:
  - "Florence"
  - "Naples"
  - "Campania"
  - "Lazio"
  - "Affile"
  - "Piedmont"
  - "Milan"
  - "Brescia"
  - "Lombardy"
  - "Bergamo"
  - "Veneto"
  - "Trieste"
  - "Savona"
  - "Emilia-Romagna"
  - "Belgium"
  - "Hungary"
  - "Japan"
  - "Italy"
  - "Estonia"
  - "Ecuador"
---


Italian firms B2B invoicing network Italy; few firms dominate centrality

Italian Business-to-Business Invoicing Data: A Network Analysis

Italian Business-to-Business Invoicing Data:
A Network Analysis
Valerio Astuti and Daniele Piras
Bank of Italy∗
Abstract
We present a comprehensive description of the network of Italian Business-
to-Business commercial relationships, based on the universe of electronic in-
voices collected by the Italian Tax Office. The firm-to-firm detail of the data
is exploited to describe the distribution of the numbers of buyers (customers)
and sellers (suppliers) per firm, the centrality of each firm in the production
network, and the average distance between firms. We characterize for the first
time the firm-to-firm network describing the Italian production system, and
present its geographic and sectoral breakdown. The analysis reveals heavy
tailed distributions for the numbers of buyers and sellers per firm, implying
a scale-free structure of the network. The distributions of centrality values
display heavy tails as well, indicating a strong concentration of importance
in a relatively small number of firms. We estimate the tail exponents for
all these distributions, finding in all cases lower exponents for downstream
(buyer-side) distributions than for the upstream (seller-side) ones.
Keywords: Production networks, input-output analysis, firm-level data, complex
networks, power-law distributions.
∗The views expressed in the paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the views of the Bank of Italy.
For correspondence: valerio.astuti@bancaditalia.it, daniele.piras@bancaditalia.it.
1
arXiv:2609.10227v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 9 Sep 2026

1
Introduction
The structure of the production network of a country is among the fundamental
elements characterizing its economy, and many insights can be derived from its study.
For example it determines how shocks propagate in the production system (Acemoglu
et al. (2010)), it helps identify the most important firms in the economy (Acemoglu et al.
(2012)), and it influences long-term growth (McNerney et al. (2022)). While traditionally
most of the economic literature focuses on the study of aggregate quantities like gross
domestic product, inflation or business cycle fluctuations, it has been relatively recently
pointed out that some results cannot be obtained without considering the micro structure
of production networks. For this reason, a growing amount of attention is dedicated to
the relationships between firms, which can provide a microfoundation for a significant
part of the aggregate fluctuations (see Gabaix (2011); Acemoglu et al. (2012); Carvalho
(2014); Baqaee and Farhi (2019)). In this paper we contribute to the growing literature
on production networks by describing for the first time the microstructure of the network
of commercial exchanges between Italian firms, using a comprehensive dataset of firm-to-
firm transactions. Our analysis reveals several key structural features of this network. We
focus in particular on the distribution of the number of connections and various measures
of centrality, offering a characterization of the production network which can be leveraged
in future applications.
The network structure of the Italian productive system is derived from the 2019 Ital-
ian electronic invoicing data. The introduction of electronic invoicing and its distribution
through a centralized system, known as Sistema di Interscambio (managed by Agenzia
delle Entrate, the Italian Tax Office), marks a transformative milestone in the digitiza-
tion of Italy’s fiscal and administrative framework. Initially introduced in 2014, from the
1st of January 2019 electronic invoicing is mandatory, up to minor exceptions,1 for both
business-to-business and business-to-consumer transactions. This extension not only re-
inforces Italy’s commitment to fiscal transparency and the fight against tax evasion, but
also offers invaluable opportunities for statistical analysis and informed policy-making.
The dataset we are provided with by Agenzia delle Entrate contains information on
the gross amount of invoices issued by Italian entities to both firms and final consumers on
a quarterly basis. For firms with legal personality we add information on the main sector
of economic activity and the province in which the head office is located. The dataset
records invoices as they are issued, so that it maps, for each issuer, its customer base
(buyers), namely its downstream connections in the network of commercial exchanges.
By focusing on each customer, it is then straightforward to map all the issued invoices,
so to also reconstruct its supplier (seller) base, namely its upstream connections.
Similar datasets have been used in several studies for other countries, but often with
limitations on the data collection procedure. In particular, it is common to have a re-
porting threshold, below which the transactions are not reported. In our dataset no such
limitation is present, and we have a complete coverage of commercial transactions. To
represent this dataset of commercial exchanges as a network, firms are represented as
nodes, and each link represents the presence (and optionally the magnitude) of the rela-
tionship between two firms when one has issued invoice(s) to the other. We study both
the existence of these connectivity relations - taking into consideration only whether two
1Firms with legal personality that are exempt from electronic invoicing, VAT associated doc-
umentary and accounting obligations are only agricultural producers with an annual turnover
below 7,000 euro — of which at least two thirds derive from the sale of agricultural and fishery
products (listed in Table A, Part I of Article 34, paragraph 6 of Presidential Decree 633/1972).
2

firms are connected - and their strength, measured by weighting relations by the yearly
total amount exchanged between the firms. The resulting network is among the largest
studied in the literature, with more than 1.6 million nodes and almost 60 million links.
We observe power-law distributions for both the number of buyers (customers) and
sellers (suppliers) of each firm, suggesting the underlying network exhibits scale-free prop-
erties. Even though we find a strong positive correlation between these two numbers, the
right tail of the distribution of the number of buyers is much heavier than the correspond-
ing one for the number of sellers. Although our analysis is static, this aligns with the
economic hypothesis that a firm grows by preferentially increasing the number of buyers
(extensive margin) and strengthening the already existing connections with its suppliers
(intensive margin) (see Mizuno et al. (2014); Oberfield (2018); Carvalho and Tahbaz-
Salehi (2019); Afrouzi et al. (2020); Bernard et al. (2022)). Scale-free networks are widely
studied in the literature, and examples cover scientific citations (Redner (1998)), protein
interactions (Jeong et al. (2001)), and the World Wide Web (Albert et al. (1999)). See
also Eikmeier and Gleich (2017) for a review of power-law distribution in real-world net-
works. Like many other scale-free networks, the Italian production network also presents
the small-world property: even though the overwhelming majority of nodes has a small
number of neighbors, from almost every node it is possible to explore the whole network
in few steps (on average less than 4, and almost all pairs of nodes can be connected in
less than 6 steps). This effect is caused by the presence of few nodes with a large number
of connections, which can act as connecting hubs between less connected nodes. In turn
this phenomenon implies that the network connectivity structure is strongly dependent
on few firms, and is critically vulnerable to targeted shocks to these firms, although more
resilient to diffused shocks, since the probability of randomly hitting these nodes is very
low.
The network is negatively assortative, that is, firms with above-average number
of connections tend to be linked to firms with below-average number of connections, in
agreement with previous findings in the literature (Newman (2003); Fujiwara and Aoyama
(2010); Bacilieri et al. (2026)).
Finally, for firms within the network, we compute and describe the properties of
five measures of centrality. These measures are commonly used to assess the relevance
of a firm within the value chain, and to estimate the effects of various types of shocks
on the network.
For these measures we give a sectoral and geographical breakdown,
revealing that buyer firms in the service sector exhibit higher centrality when considering
the number of connections, whereas utility companies emerge as the most influential nodes
in terms of the monetary volume exchanged. From a geographical perspective, we find
a pronounced difference between the provinces in the central and northern regions of
Italy and the rest of the country, both in terms of number of connections and network
centrality.
More specifically, alongside major provinces - which unsurprisingly retain
considerable significance - the analysis identifies additional smaller provinces within the
central and northern regions distinguished by the presence of relevant firms operating in
the construction, manufacturing, and real estate sectors.
1.1
Related literature
The study of production systems from a network perspective was initiated in the
economics literature by Leontief (see Leontief (1928, 1941)). In this branch of literature
the structure of the production network is depicted as consisting of a representative firm
for each sector composing the economy, and the focus of the study is the input-output
network between these representative firms. More recent applications include an anal-
ysis of the importance of wealthy families in Renaissance Florence (Padgett and Ansell
3

(1993)), the role of the network structure in the diffusion of information (Banerjee et al.
(2013, 2014)), and the transmission of microeconomic shocks to the aggregate economy
(Acemoglu et al. (2010)). The importance of the microstructure of production networks
was pointed out also in Carvalho (2014), in which the author shows that idiosyncratic
firm-level shocks can generate aggregate fluctuations when propagated through input-
output linkages. These findings challenged the conventional belief that microeconomic
shocks would cancel out in the aggregate, highlighting instead how network structures
can amplify initially localized perturbations.
Recent innovations in data collection processes have expanded the range of possibili-
ties for characterizing the underlying network structure of many systems. In particular,
the theory of networks has been applied to the World Wide Web (see Albert et al. (1999)),
to the analysis of power grids (see Pagani and Aiello (2013) for a review), and to the study
of human mobility (Gonzalez et al. (2008)). The increasing availability of micro-data al-
lowed at the same time to characterize real-world production networks with unprecedented
detail, often at level of firm’s transaction. In Bernard et al. (2019) the geographic dimen-
sion of production networks and its role in the marginal costs of production was studied
using Japanese transaction data. Dhyne et al. (2021) used Belgian data on firm-to-firm
sales to assess the dependence on foreign markets and the sensitivity to trade shocks.
Micro-data are used also in Criscuolo et al. (2024) to characterize the network structure
of the Estonian production system, and a recent review of similar works can be found in
Bacilieri et al. (2026).
The relation between a node centrality and its economic importance is explored in
Acemoglu et al. (2012), while in Banerjee et al. (2013, 2014) the authors analyzed the
role of network centrality in information diffusion and financial participation. The most
direct application of the concept of centrality is in the analysis of shock propagation: in
Acemoglu et al. (2010, 2013) the importance of the network struc