Researchers show Japan’s economy contracts regionally; Tokyo-bound migration drives wage premium.
How an Economy Shrinks in Space: Concavity-on-Jobs and Upward Consolidation under Demographic Decline
How an Economy Shrinks in Space: Concavity-on-Jobs and Upward Consolidation under Demographic Decline Thanks: This study is conducted as a part of the Project “Sustainability of Cities and Regions in Japan under Population Decline” undertaken at the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI). The draft of this paper was presented at the RIETI Discussion Paper Seminar; the authors would like to thank the participants for their helpful comments. The data of the Japanese Panel Study of Employment Dynamics (JPSED), Recruit Works Institute, were provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 25H00543 and 24H00012, the Mitsubishi Foundation Humanities Research Grant, a research grant from the Kajima Foundation, and the Joint Usage
Research Center program of the Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University. The authors used Anthropic’s Claude (Fable 5) as a coding and writing assistant during the preparation of this paper, in particular for data-pipeline scripting in Python, regression-output formatting in LaTeX, and prose drafting and editing. All conceptual choices, empirical specifications, and substantive interpretations are the authors’ own.
When a country’s population declines, the aggregate economy appears to contract on the intensive margin: industrial diversity intact, every industry a little smaller. At the regional level, contraction is uneven and takes the extensive form: entire industries disappear, one after another. The relevant unit is the city: industries are nested by size—the hierarchy property of industrial location —each viable only above a minimum population. Necessity industries’ thresholds bunch at the low end, so a city’s industry count—and its jobs—is sharply concave in size ( concavity on jobs ). A modest loss pushes a small city below many thresholds at once; a large core sheds a few specialized industries, one at a time. Lost industries consolidate upward to the next city large enough to host them; for the worker it means a step down to a lower-paid local job. To recover that income, workers move up to the apex—the only city hosting the full industry range. Studying Japan—two decades ahead of the OECD, Tokyo at its apex—with worker-level panel data on the young workers who carry the migration, a wage regression in real, housing-inclusive wages identifies a Tokyo-bound migration incentive that varies by origin, following concavity on jobs.
Keywords: hierarchical industry location; demographic decline; concavity on jobs; upward consolidation; interregional migration; wage premium; central place theory; agglomeration economies
JEL Classification: R23, J11, R11, J61, R12, J21
Working-age decline is now one of the most consequential structural challenges facing developed economies. The United Nations 2024 World Population Prospects projects that more than thirty countries will see their working-age population shrink by over 10 % 10% by 2050, with Korea, Italy, Germany, and Japan contracting by more than 25 % 25% on current trajectories ( United Nations, 2024 ) . The macroeconomic consequences of population aging —for growth, productivity, and automation—have been studied extensively ( Acemoglu and Restrepo, 2017 ; Acemoglu and Restrepo, 2022 ; Maestas et al., 2023 ) . Outright population decline , by contrast, has become a subject in its own right only recently, in a still-small literature: Jones (2022) shows that a shrinking population can end growth by drying up the creation of new ideas, while Hopenhayn et al. (2022) and Karahan et al. (2024) trace slowing population growth to firm aging and the start-up deficit. What remains far less understood is how sustained contraction reshapes the spatial organization of economic activity within a country.
At the national level, the reshaping is nearly invisible. Japan’s industrial diversity was untouched by its first decade of decline: every 3-digit industry present in 2009 was still present nationally in 2020 (Section 2.2 ). Aggregate contraction therefore looks like every industry shrinking a little — an intensive-margin adjustment. This paper shows that beneath the aggregate, decline reorganizes the economy along its urban hierarchy. The smaller the city, the more its contraction takes the extensive form: entire industries vanish from the city, one after another. A regional divergence thus opens up that macro data cannot see. The displaced workers relocate up the hierarchy, so rural contraction feeds metropolitan concentration. The divergence widens further, and the process ultimately consolidates into the concentration of population in the largest city, Tokyo. The paper focuses on the key consequence of this process: the wage premium that rural contraction generates for migration into Tokyo, the terminal metropolis of the urban hierarchy.
Notes: Japan peaked in 1995 and has declined by approximately 17% in the three decades since; Korea peaked in 2018, twenty-three years behind. Italy (1992) and Germany (1997) both peaked in the 1990s and subsequently reached secondary local peaks—Italy in 2010, Germany in 2016—through immigration, before resuming decline; the United States is still growing under current immigration patterns. Source: World Bank (2024) .
Japan is two decades ahead of the rest of the OECD on this trajectory (Figure 1 ): its working-age population has been contracting since the mid-1990s and its total population since around 2008, so the years from 2010 on are Japan’s first phase of sustained national-population decline. Through exactly this decline phase, inter-prefectural migration into the Tokyo metropolitan area (MA) 1 1 1 Throughout the paper, the Tokyo metropolitan area refers to the four prefectures of Tokyo, Saitama, Chiba, and Kanagawa. has accelerated . Basic Resident Registry data (Section 2.1 ) show that the annual net inflow to Tokyo MA roughly doubled from ≈ 60,000 \approx 60{,}000 in 2010 to over 110,000 110{,}000 by 2024–25, even as the next three major centers—Osaka, Nagoya, and Fukuoka—plateaued or turned negative: net concentration is now unipolar toward Tokyo. This inflow is overwhelmingly young—the 30+ net inflow stays an order of magnitude smaller. Concentration of the young in Tokyo is itself long-running—the 20–29 residential share rose from ≈ 20 % \approx 20% in 1955 to 34 % 34% in 2025—but its pace singles out the decline phase. After the 1960s urbanization surge ( + 5 +5 pp per decade), the young-share held essentially flat through the post-bubble decades ( 31.6 % 31.6% in 1990 to 31.2 % 31.2% in 2010), then re-accelerated as national decline set in, rising + 2.7 +2.7 pp to 33.9 % 33.9% over 2010–2020 alone (Section 2 ). This still-accelerating concentration in the face of national contraction is itself a striking empirical pattern, and existing theory has not yet provided the resources to interpret it.
Hierarchical industry location and demographic decline.
Behind the accelerating Tokyo concentration documented above lies a mechanism that is sharp at the city level but harder to see at the administrative-region level, where urban and rural zones are pooled together. That mechanism, we argue, is an extensive-margin reorganization of the urban system: as the national population contracts, the set of industries each city can locally sustain changes, and these changes differ systematically across city sizes. This reorganization is grounded in the hierarchy property of industrial location established by Mori et al. (2008) ; Mori and Smith (2011) : industry location is nested by city size, so that a smaller city’s set of locally hosted industries is approximately a subset of any larger city’s, and the most specialized industries are confined to the few largest cities. The confinement is a matter of population: hosting a wide industry range, up to the specialized end, requires a correspondingly large population, so the cities able to do so are necessarily few ( Christaller, 1933 ; Fujita et al., 1999 ; Hsu, 2012 ) — the more specialized the industry, the fewer and the larger its host cities ( Mori et al., 2008 ; Mori and Smith, 2011 ) . Throughout the paper, “city” refers specifically to the Urban Agglomeration (UA; maximal contiguous cluster of high-density grid cells; Appendix A.2 maps Japan’s 2010 urban system at this definition)—the spatial unit central-place theory ( Christaller, 1933 ; Fujita et al., 1999 ; Tabuchi and Thisse, 2011 ; Hsu, 2012 ; Davis and Dingel, 2020 ) predicts industry hosting on, with Mori et al. (2023) validating the hierarchy property empirically at this grain. We verify the nesting directly on Japan’s establishment data at the UA grain in Section 2.2 . An immediate corollary, and the single primitive of the framework we develop (Section 3 ), is that each industry has a minimum population threshold below which it cannot be locally sustained, so a city’s size determines the range of industries it can host. These thresholds span the full range from high to low; Online Appendix (Table ) lists the industries characteristic of each size class. The higher an industry’s threshold, the more specialized ( high-order ) it is, and the rarer its hosts: commodity-specific trading lines and cardiovascular surgery are found only above 10 10 M (Tokyo and Osaka), TV-program production and specialized-book publishing above 1 1 M, neurosurgery, live-music venues, and kaiseki restaurants above 500 500 k. Descending the ladder — obstetricians, lawyers, and wedding halls at 50 50 k; internists, bakeries, and funeral services at 30 30 k — the examples themselves show the industries shading into everyday necessities : the ubiquitous ( low-order ) end, present in every city.
When a city’s population falls, it drops below the thresholds of its own highest-order industries first; these do not disappear but consolidate upward to a larger city that still clears their threshold, ultimately Tokyo at the apex. A city therefore loses jobs not by shrinking each industry it already has (an intensive margin) but by losing whole industries (the extensive margin). This upward consolidation operates at cities of every size—it is the single mechanism behind the reorganization—and what differs across the size distribution is only its pace . Because ubiquitous industries are everyday necessities sustainable at modest scale, their thresholds bunch closely together at the low end of the size axis, while specialized industries are spaced far apart at the top; a given proportional population loss therefore crosses many thresholds at once in a small city, whose marginal industries sit in that dense necessity band, but only one at a time in a large core. The count of locally hosted industries—and so of jobs—should then be concave in city size. As decline deepens, the smallest cities shed the largest share of their industries, and with them the population those industries sustain. This is concavity on jobs .
This is what Japan’s 448 448 Urban Agglomerations (UA) show (Section 2.2 ). The 2010 hosted-industry count is sharply concave in UA size (Figure 4 a); tracking each UA’s 2010 industries to 2020 on fixed 2010 polygons confirms that smaller UAs lose a larger share of them (panel b). Because the industries a small city loses are its everyday necessities, its residents lose the services they live on and move away, so population falls fastest in the smallest UAs (panel c: small UAs shrank 10 10 – 20 % 20% over 2010–2020, with 74 % 74% of all UAs declining). The workers who leave flow predominantly to Tokyo, the apex that hosts the full industry range. Below, we work out what that move does to their wages.
Why does the hierarchy translate into a wage premium? The