Shreyan Mitra et al. describe open Sentinel-2 active-fire dataset across California; 2,148 image-mask pairs

Shreyan Mitra et al. describe open Sentinel-2 active-fire dataset across California; 2,148 image-mask pairs

A Sentinel-2 benchmark dataset for deep-learning active-fire segmentation across 25 California wildfires

A Sentinel-2 benchmark dataset for deep-learning active-fire segmentation across 25 California wildfires Shreyan Mitraa, Mohammadreza Narimanib,∗and Parastoo Farajpoorb aCalifornia High School, San Ramon, CA, 94583, USA bDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA A R T I C L E I N F O Keywords: Sentinel-2 Wildfire detection Semantic segmentation Deep learning Benchmark dataset Weak supervision Remote sensing Abstract This article describes an open image dataset for developing and evaluating active-fire segmentation methods in satellite imagery. The dataset contains 2,148 image-mask pairs from 25 California wildfires, with acquisitions spanning July 2020 to August 2026. Each image is a 512 × 512-pixel, three-channel composite derived from Sentinel-2 Level-2A bands B12, B11 and B8A at 20 m spatial sampling. A fixed linear rendering is applied throughout the dataset. Corresponding masks distinguish background, SWIR-rule active fire and invalid observations. The masks were generated from shortwave-infrared brightness and near-infrared contrast, followed by constrained neighborhood growth. The release includes chip-level metadata and an incident-disjoint partition containing 18 training, three validation and four test fires. Among the image pairs, 841 contain active-fire labels; these labels occupy 0.0766% of all grid cells. A mask-blind analyst review covers 233 test chips and provides a separate assessment of the rule-generated labels at chip and connected-component levels. Reference training and evaluation code accompanies the data, including a ResNet-34 U-Net implementation with validation-based checkpoint and threshold selection. The archived images, masks, metadata and review annotations support research on rare-class segmentation, learning from algorithmic labels and transfer across fire incidents. The versioned dataset is deposited on Zenodo, with preparation and reuse software maintained in a public GitHub repository.

1. Value of the Data • The paired images and masks provide a common input representation for active-fire segmentation, including fire-free scenes and an explicitly encoded invalid- observation class. • Remote-sensing researchers, computer-vision researchers and wildfire scientists can use the incident- disjoint partition to compare methods on fires excluded from training. • Sparse positive labels and a wide range of hotspot sizes support studies of class imbalance, sampling, decision thresholds and learning from algorithmic supervision. • The separately distributed analyst annotations support assessment of label agreement and development of review or relabeling strategies without replacing the original rule-generated targets. • Open preparation and training code documents the rendering, label rule, sampling and evaluation conven- tions, allowing users to distinguish reproduction of the archived experiment from construction of an updated dataset.
2. Background An active-fire mask describes where a satellite obser- vation contains evidence of ongoing combustion; it is not a map of the area eventually burned. Sentinel-2 provides ∗Corresponding author mnarimani@ucdavis.edu (M. Narimani) shortwave-infrared observations at 20 m sampling that can be used to resolve spatial patterns of active fire [3]. Converting those observations into reusable learning data requires an explicit record of how images were selected, how labels were generated and which observations belong to each evaluation partition. Related Sentinel-2 research in crop-yield estimation high- lights how feature representation, reference-data availability and transfer across sites and years influence model use [4]. An active-fire benchmark addresses a different target, but benefits from the same explicit separation of sensor observations, derived labels and evaluation units. Existing resources address related tasks at different observation scales. Pereira et al. [5] developed a Landsat-8 active-fire dataset with algorithmic annotations and a separate manually annotated evaluation resource. Fire-video annota- tions provide frame-level segmentation data for camera-based surveillance [6], while geospatial incident datasets describe the timing, location and extent of wildfire and prescribed-fire activity [7]. The present dataset complements these resources with fixed-rendering Sentinel-2 image-mask pairs, incident- level partitions and a separately documented analyst review. Its purpose is to provide an accessible reference dataset for pixel classification under sparse, algorithmically generated supervision, rather than to introduce a new segmentation architecture.
3. Data Description 3.1. Release organization and partition inventory The dataset is archived as version 1.0.0 on Zenodo [1]. The deposit comprises paired image and mask directories, Mitra et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 1 of 13 arXiv:2609.16199v1 [eess.IV] 14 Sep 2026

Table 1 Specifications table. Item Description Subject Earth and Planetary Sciences Specific subject area Satellite remote sensing; active-fire segmentation; deep learning with algorithmic supervision Type of data Three-channel images; categorical masks; tabular metadata; analyst annotations; descriptive figures; Python software How the data were acquired Sentinel-2 Level-2A assets were accessed through the Earth Search SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC) service. National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) Wildland Fire Interagency Geospatial Services (WFIGS) perimeter records supplied incident locations and dates. Images were sampled, rendered and labeled with the public preparation code. Data format Processed 8-bit RGB PNG images; single-channel integer PNG masks; CSV metadata. Source reflectance assets are accessed during construction; they are not the distributed image representation. Description of data collection Twenty-five large California wildfire incidents (WFIGS attr_IncidentTypeCategory = WF; all retained names verified as WF) were selected from the queried records. Up to 14 acquisition dates per incident were sampled within bounded post-discovery windows. Scene-specific 1,536 × 1,536-pixel windows were divided into 512 × 512-pixel chips. The final archive contains both fire-bearing and fire-free chips. Data source location California, United States. The incident distribution is shown in Figure 2. Dataset preparation and analysis: University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Acquisition dates reported for the release: 23 July 2020 to 21 August 2026. Data accessibility Repository: Zenodo. Dataset: California Sentinel-2 Active-Fire Segmentation Dataset, version 1.0.0 [1]. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22713948. Data license: CC BY 4.0. Companion software California_Sentinel2_Active_Fire_Dataset [2], MIT license. Public repository: https://github.com/Moh ammadrezaNarimaniUCDavis/California_Sentinel2_Active_Fire_Dataset. The implementation described here was inspected at commit e5e4667. Related research article None. Table 2 Incident-disjoint partition inventory. Fire prevalence uses all 512 × 512 grid cells in the denominator, including cells encoded as invalid; training and evaluation instead exclude invalid cells. Partition Incidents Chips Fire-bearing chips Fire pixels Fire prevalence (%) Training 18 1,470 548 284,948 0.0739 Validation 3 246 137 75,028 0.1163 Test 4 432 156 71,451 0.0631 Total 25 2,148 841 431,427 0.0766 a chip manifest, a partition file and analyst-review masks. The public repository [2] provides the construction, training and annotation-import scripts. Table 2 gives the partition inventory; Figure 1 summarizes the corresponding chip and incident counts and the proportion of grid cells labeled as fire. All observations assigned to Castle, McCash and Bobcat belong to validation. Slater, Hopkins, CALDWELL and Windy form the test partition; the remaining 18 incidents form the training partition. The archive contains 1,307 fire- free chips and 841 fire-bearing chips, so the released corpus is not a balanced binary image-classification dataset. These counts describe the archived samples, not an estimate of the frequency of fire in California satellite observations. Each image and its corresponding mask share a basename of the form {fire_slug}_{YYYY-MM- DD}_r{row}c{column}.png. The row and column indices range from 0 to 2 within a sampled parent window. A file can therefore be associated with its incident, observation date and position in that window without opening the image. 3.2. Spatial and temporal coverage Figure 2 locates the 25 incident perimeters and their partition assignments. Perimeters provide the spatial context for sampling; they are not the active-fire labels. Individual chips sample a 10.24 km-wide window, while each sampled parent window spans 30.72 km. The release includes repeated observations of incident surroundings, rather than a continu- ous statewide mosaic. Repeated acquisitions can support different analytical tasks. For example, Sentinel-2 time-series analysis of broomrape-infested tomato fields used growing-degree-day alignment to compare vegetation trajectories across crop stages [8]. Here, dates identify individual fire observations within bounded incident windows; the distributed chips support acquisition-specific segmentation rather than a phenologically aligned sequence. Mitra et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 2 of 13

Figure 1: Dataset and partition inventory. (a) Chip counts, subdivided into chips with and without rule-generated fire labels. (b) Numbers of incidents in the training, validation and test partitions. (c) Fire-pixel prevalence as a percentage of all grid cells in each partition. Dark and light portions in panel (a) denote fire-bearing and fire-free chips, respectively. The partition is disjoint by incident name. 3.3. Image channels, label encoding and metadata The distributed RGB channels represent B12, B11 and B8A, respectively. The first two are shortwave-infrared bands and the third is the narrow near-infrared band. These three bands are sampled at their native 20 m spacing [3]. A single set of rendering limits is applied to all chips, rather than estimating a separate contrast stretch for each image. Table 3 summarizes the files and metadata needed to read the release. At a different observation scale, multi-trait grapevine modeling used hyperspectral measurements to estimate leaf biochemical and nutritional attributes [9]. The distinction is one of representation and target: quantitative trait retrieval uses spectral measurements, whereas these rendered image channels provide a common input for locating rule-labeled fire. The spectral rationale for the label rule follows the use of shortwave-infrared contrast for hot-target detection [10]. Figure 3 illustrates that contrast with measured converted L2A band-value distributions for the three distributed bands (B8A, B11, B12) on hand-drawn class ROIs from a Castle chip. Figure 4 presents four image-mask examples, with true- color views included solely as visual context. 3.4. Positive-class prevalence and spatial structure Across the release, 431,427 grid cells carry active-fire labels. A total of 841 chips, or 39.2% of all chips, contain at least one such cell. The median fire-bearing chip contains 79 fire-labeled cells. Figure 5a describes the distribution across positive chips, and Figure 5b describes connected-component sizes in the test partition. The median test component contains six pixels. Com- ponents smaller than ten pixels account for approximately 64% of test components but 12% of test fire-labeled pixels. Component counts and pixel counts thus emphasize different aspects of the same targets. The inventory supports both pixel-level evaluation and separately defined component- level evaluation, provided that the connectivity and matching conventions